What Happened With the Square Enix Lawsuit?
Square Enix took to court last week. They are trying to prevent the release of a new mecha game in the US. The game’s concept is similar to that of the Front Mission series. This goes beyond what was expected by many fans. The issue at hand is that of copyright infringement.
Details About the Disputed Game
In an unnamed game which features giant robots we see designs very much like Front Mission. Players take control of squads in tactical battles. The game is a mix of RPG, strategy and action elements. Many players immediately noticed the similarities.
Gameplay Similarities
Both in grid based maps we see in both games, characters also have the very large option of which aspects of their mechs they can change and fine tune. Game play is very similar in which it is almost as if the developers took the base model from the same place. Also, to note is the very similar interface layout that is used. Which finally led to Square Enix’s response.
Visual Comparisons
The art style is very much a take on that of Front Mission. Mechanical designs present similar elements. Character proportions are based off the same principles. Color schemes are almost the same. These visual elements really sold it.
Legal Arguments in the Case
Square Enix reports of copyright infringement. They say the game is too closely based on protected material. The developers put out that they are not in fact true. They present the similarities as random. Which way the courts will rule is yet to be seen.
Copyright Law Basics
Copyright which is given to original creative works. We see it in characters, designs and mechanics. What we have with game mechanics is a different story which is hard to protect. For visual elements we see stronger protection. As a results we have very complex legal issues.
Previous Gaming Lawsuits
In the past we saw similar cases to this. Some were successful which others were not. Courts look at what I would term as large scale similarity issues. They separate out the protectable elements. What results in terms of which case succeeds or fails is very much a function of the specific circumstances at hand.
Impact on Game Developers
The issue at hand is independent developers. Many of them work on classic game remakes. Lawsuits may see them incur greater expenses. Some may put out completely different project plans. The gaming community is in a state of discussion regarding this.
Indie Development Challenges
Small groups of people do not have access to the same legal resources. They may go bankrupt from a single lawsuit. Also it doesn’t take much for a false claim to do damage. This issue is a great threat to creative freedom. In this case we may see set very important precedents.
Fan Reactions
Players are split in the lawsuit. Some support Square Enix’s stand. Others put forward what they see as corporate bullying. Many are calling for more detailed legal info. The debate is playing out online.
Future of Strategy RPGs
The genre is a recent phenomenon. We see many new products which have come to the market. Some of them are very much in the classic style. Others are break through in terms of innovation. Legal actions may in fact change this trend.
Innovation vs. Inspiration
Developers have to walk this line. We see in some cases that too far toward the familiar breaks the magic. In other times not enough familiarity with the elements dooms sales. What we have here is games that do it just right. This is a case in point.
Market Trends
Tactical RPG’s had a rise in popularity. We see a trend of in depth strategy play. Also note that mecha themes do very well with certain groups. In recent years we also noticed growth in the multi player aspect. Also see a trend of sports and racing elements in the RPG which have mixed with the core game play.
What This Means for Players
Fans won’t see the controversial release which is a cause of much legal action that plays out over the course of months or years. Also other developers may become very cautious. We see a reduction in game diversity. In the end players which is what it all comes down to have fewer choices.
Alternative Games Available
Some present the strategy element in full which is great for that aspect, some put in large doses of action which really enlivens the game, and a few have simulation features which add a real world feel. Also what we see is that most games in the category do not go for the same visual look as their predecessors.
Purchasing Decisions
Consumums should look into what games they are playing. Support the independent creators when you can. Familiarize yourself with copyright issues. When in doubt research which products to purchase. The gaming community grows with awareness.
Conclusion
Square Enix’s issue brings to light key issues. They put forward issues of copyright in our field. Developers have to pay attention to intellectual property. We see to it that what players get is original. What the outcome will be is very much a factor in future RPGs. The gaming world is very much tuned in.
FAQs
1. Why is Square Enix suing?
Square Enix reports that the new game is too close to what they do in the Front Mission series, also which they see as a copyright issue.
2. What happens if Square Enix wins?
Disputed games may not go through with full development or may be changed out at the last minute. Also other developers may be too scared to take on a similar project.
3. How long will the lawsuit take?
Legal issues which go to trial may last for months or years. The court process is a slow one which goes through many stages.
4. Are there other games like Front Mission?
Yes I have noticed that in many strategy RPGs mechs and tactical combat are featured. Also some do it for inspiration rather than direct copy.
5. What defines a Front Mission-style game?
These in the past have been characterized by custom mechanical design, grid based battle, and in depth RPG aspects. Also they have very well integrated strategy and action.
#FrontMission #SquareEnix #MechaGames #RPG #StrategyGames #GamingNews
- First important point about the content
- Second point with detailed explanation
- Another noteworthy detail
- Final concluding thought